The iconic 80s film script rejected over 40 times was, astonishingly, Back to the Future. This revelation underscores the volatile and often unpredictable nature of the film industry, highlighting that even brilliance can face significant hurdles on its path to the silver screen.
The Road to Hill Valley: A Tale of Rejection
Back to the Future, a film that defined a generation, a movie teeming with quotable lines, groundbreaking special effects, and a universally appealing story, endured a staggering number of rejections before finally finding its way into theaters. The script, penned by Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale, faced a gauntlet of studio executives who, despite the script’s clear potential, passed on the project time and time again. The reasons for these rejections were varied, ranging from concerns about its family-friendliness to doubts about its commercial viability.
Understanding the Initial Hesitation
It’s difficult, in retrospect, to comprehend the initial resistance to Back to the Future. The concept of a teenager accidentally traveling back in time and interfering with his parents’ meeting is inherently engaging. However, in the early 80s, Hollywood was operating under different assumptions.
-
Comedy’s Shifting Landscape: The comedy landscape was evolving. Raunchy comedies were gaining traction, and a science fiction comedy with a strong emphasis on family values seemed out of step with prevailing trends.
-
Steven Spielberg’s Influence: Paradoxically, Steven Spielberg, initially attached as an executive producer, proved to be a hindrance. Some studios perceived his involvement as a signal that the film would be targeted at a younger audience, limiting its potential box office appeal.
-
The “Family Friendliness” Paradox: Several studios deemed the script too wholesome. The story involved the protagonist potentially erasing his own existence by preventing his parents from falling in love, which some executives felt was too sensitive a subject for a family film.
The Pivotal Moment: Romancing the Stone
The turning point for Back to the Future arrived after Zemeckis directed Romancing the Stone. The film’s success demonstrated Zemeckis’s ability to deliver a crowd-pleasing adventure with a strong comedic element. This newfound credibility convinced Universal Pictures to finally take a chance on Back to the Future.
Exploring the FAQs: Delving Deeper into the History
To further understand the convoluted path of Back to the Future, let’s examine some frequently asked questions surrounding its development:
H3: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What were the main reasons studios initially rejected Back to the Future?
Studios cited various reasons, including concerns about its family-friendly tone, Spielberg’s association potentially limiting its appeal, and doubts about its commercial viability compared to raunchier comedies that were popular at the time. Some also found the concept of a teenager potentially erasing himself from existence too sensitive.
2. Which studios initially passed on the script?
Numerous studios rejected the script, including Disney, who reportedly deemed it too sexually suggestive (ironically, given the incestuous undertones!). Others included Columbia Pictures, Warner Bros., and several smaller production companies.
3. How did Romancing the Stone influence Universal’s decision to greenlight Back to the Future?
The success of Romancing the Stone, directed by Robert Zemeckis, proved that he could direct a commercially successful, crowd-pleasing adventure film. This gave Universal Pictures the confidence they needed to take a risk on Back to the Future.
4. Was Michael J. Fox always the first choice for Marty McFly?
No. Michael J. Fox was the first choice but was unavailable due to his commitment to the TV show Family Ties. Eric Stoltz was initially cast as Marty, but after several weeks of filming, Zemeckis and Gale realized he wasn’t the right fit. Fox eventually became available, and Stoltz was replaced.
5. Why was Eric Stoltz replaced? What wasn’t working?
Stoltz, an excellent dramatic actor, wasn’t delivering the comedic timing and lightheartedness that Zemeckis and Gale envisioned for Marty McFly. They felt he was playing the role too intensely and lacked the necessary charm.
6. How did Steven Spielberg contribute to the project?
Spielberg served as an executive producer, providing creative input and support. While his involvement initially raised concerns with some studios, his backing ultimately helped secure financing and distribution once Universal came on board.
7. Did the script undergo significant revisions during the rejection process?
Yes, the script went through numerous revisions based on feedback from various studios and individuals. These changes included altering certain plot points, refining the humor, and streamlining the narrative.
8. What was the original ending planned for Back to the Future?
The original ending involved Marty returning to 1985 by harnessing the power of a nuclear explosion at the Nevada Test Site. This was deemed too expensive and logistically challenging, leading to the iconic lightning strike climax.
9. How much did Back to the Future ultimately gross at the box office?
Back to the Future became a global phenomenon, grossing over $381 million worldwide, making it the highest-grossing film of 1985.
10. What lasting impact has Back to the Future had on popular culture?
Back to the Future has had a profound and lasting impact on popular culture, influencing countless films, TV shows, and other forms of media. Its themes of time travel, family, and self-discovery continue to resonate with audiences today. The film also popularized several iconic images and catchphrases, like the DeLorean time machine and the line “Great Scott!”
11. Were sequels always planned, or did the success of the first film lead to their creation?
The ending of Back to the Future was not originally intended to set up a sequel. However, the film’s immense success prompted Zemeckis and Gale to explore further adventures with Marty and Doc, leading to Back to the Future Part II and Back to the Future Part III.
12. What lesson can aspiring screenwriters learn from the Back to the Future story?
The Back to the Future story offers invaluable lessons for aspiring screenwriters: Persistence is key. Even the most brilliant ideas can face rejection. Don’t give up on your vision. Also, be open to feedback and willing to revise your work, but don’t compromise your core creative instincts. Finally, understand that the film industry is subjective, and what one person dislikes, another may love.
The Legacy of a Timeless Classic
The remarkable journey of Back to the Future, from a script facing constant rejection to a global cinematic phenomenon, serves as a powerful reminder of the unpredictable nature of the film industry. It’s a testament to the importance of belief in one’s own work, the power of perseverance, and the often-circuitous route that even the greatest stories must navigate to reach their audience. The film’s enduring popularity proves that a well-crafted story, filled with heart, humor, and a touch of the fantastical, can transcend initial doubts and achieve timeless classic status. The story behind Back to the Future is almost as compelling as the movie itself and further highlights the magic of cinema.