Mr. Davenport Scott, though unseen, is the linchpin of the film “The Dresser,” a legendary but ailing Shakespearean actor whose increasingly erratic behavior throws his entire touring company, especially his loyal dresser Norman, into turmoil. He represents the fading glory of a bygone era of theatre, the immense pressure of performance, and the devastating impact of mental decline on artistic genius.
The Ghost in the Wings: Understanding Davenport Scott
Davenport Scott is more than just an off-screen character; he is a force of nature that shapes the entire narrative of “The Dresser.” We experience him through the eyes of Norman (Albert Finney), his devoted dresser and caretaker, and the increasingly exasperated members of his touring company. His legendary reputation as a Shakespearean actor precedes him, painting a picture of a theatrical giant. However, this image is constantly juxtaposed with his present state of decline, marked by confusion, memory loss, and fits of rage.
The film subtly reveals that Scott’s mental state is deteriorating rapidly. His inability to remember lines, his dependence on Norman for even the simplest tasks, and his delusional belief that he is still at the height of his powers, all point to a significant cognitive impairment, likely accelerated by the pressures of performing under wartime conditions.
While his physical presence is minimal, Scott’s influence permeates every scene. He is the reason the show must go on, the reason Norman sacrifices his own well-being, and the reason the rest of the company tolerates the chaotic conditions. His absence ironically makes him the most present character in the film.
He represents the dying art of classical theatre, clinging to existence in a world increasingly preoccupied with war and its attendant horrors. The bombings and rationing outside the theatre walls are a stark contrast to the fantastical world Scott creates on stage, a world he desperately needs to believe in to maintain his sanity. Ultimately, Davenport Scott is a tragic figure, a brilliant artist whose mind is succumbing to the ravages of time and the crushing weight of expectation.
Unpacking Davenport Scott: Frequently Asked Questions
H3 What exactly is wrong with Mr. Davenport Scott?
While never explicitly diagnosed within the film, Davenport Scott exhibits symptoms consistent with dementia, likely a form of vascular dementia accelerated by stress and potentially complicated by alcohol use (implied, not explicitly shown). His symptoms include memory loss, confusion, disorientation, paranoia, delusions, and difficulty concentrating. The film subtly depicts the progression of these symptoms, highlighting the devastating impact on both Scott himself and those around him.
H3 Why is Norman so devoted to him?
Norman’s devotion to Davenport Scott is complex and multifaceted. It’s a blend of genuine affection, professional loyalty, a codependent relationship, and perhaps even a form of hero worship. Norman has dedicated his life to serving Scott, effectively becoming his caretaker, friend, and confidante. This dedication provides Norman with a sense of purpose and importance that he might not otherwise find. There’s also an element of fear; Norman is aware his livelihood is tied to Scott’s continued performance.
H3 What is the significance of “King Lear” in the film?
“King Lear,” the play Davenport Scott is struggling to perform, mirrors his own declining state. Lear’s descent into madness and loss of power resonate with Scott’s own cognitive decline and the fading of his theatrical reign. The themes of age, loss, and betrayal present in the play are directly reflected in the relationships between Scott, Norman, and the other members of the company. The fact that Scott is unable to consistently remember his lines underscores this parallel and emphasizes the tragedy of his situation.
H3 How does the wartime setting affect Davenport Scott and the company?
The backdrop of World War II adds another layer of complexity to the narrative. The constant threat of bombing raids and the rationing of resources create a palpable sense of anxiety and uncertainty. This pressure exacerbates Scott’s mental instability and makes it even more difficult for the company to function. The theatre becomes a refuge from the outside world, a place where they can momentarily escape the horrors of war, but it is a precarious sanctuary.
H3 Is Davenport Scott based on a real person?
While not directly based on a single individual, Davenport Scott is widely considered to be inspired by the experiences of Sir Donald Wolfit, a prominent British actor-manager known for his Shakespearean productions and his demanding personality. The film borrows elements from Wolfit’s life and career, including his wartime tours and his reputation for being difficult to work with. However, Scott is ultimately a fictional creation, representing a broader archetype of the fading theatrical star.
H3 Why does Davenport Scott call Norman “My wife”?
This is a recurring and poignant motif. Scott’s mistaking Norman for his wife highlights his disorientation and memory loss. It also suggests a deep-seated emotional need for comfort and stability that Norman, in his role as dresser and caretaker, provides. The confusion underscores the blurring of lines between personal and professional relationships, a key theme of the film.
H3 Does Davenport Scott truly appreciate Norman’s efforts?
The film deliberately leaves this question open to interpretation. There are moments when Scott seems genuinely grateful for Norman’s support, but these are often interspersed with periods of neglect and even abuse. It’s possible that Scott’s mental state prevents him from fully appreciating Norman’s sacrifices, or that he simply takes Norman for granted. Regardless, Norman’s unwavering loyalty is ultimately rewarded with only fleeting moments of acknowledgment.
H3 What is the significance of the play’s opening night going ahead despite the circumstances?
The decision to proceed with the opening night of “King Lear” despite the chaos and uncertainty symbolizes the enduring power of art and the resilience of the human spirit. It’s a testament to the company’s dedication to their craft and their determination to provide a moment of escape for the audience. It also reinforces the idea that, even in the face of adversity, the show must go on. This act of defiance becomes a powerful symbol of resistance against the overwhelming bleakness of war.
H3 How does “The Dresser” explore the theme of co-dependency?
The relationship between Davenport Scott and Norman is a classic example of co-dependency. Norman’s life revolves around Scott’s needs, and he derives his sense of self-worth from serving him. Scott, in turn, relies on Norman to function, but often treats him with disdain. This unhealthy dynamic is fueled by Scott’s dependence and Norman’s need to be needed, creating a cycle of emotional dependence and resentment.
H3 What happens to Davenport Scott after the performance?
After the successful performance of “King Lear,” Davenport Scott collapses and dies in his dressing room. This event is both tragic and cathartic. It marks the end of an era, both for Scott himself and for the type of theatre he represents. It also frees Norman from his burden, allowing him to finally pursue his own life.
H3 What is the ultimate message of “The Dresser”?
“The Dresser” explores themes of loyalty, sacrifice, the fragility of the human mind, and the enduring power of art. It highlights the often-unseen sacrifices made by those who support great artists and the complex dynamics of power and dependence. Ultimately, the film celebrates the enduring spirit of theatre and the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the toll that ambition and artistic dedication can take on both the individual and those around them.
H3 What lasting impact does Davenport Scott have on Norman?
Davenport Scott’s impact on Norman is profound and lasting. Norman dedicated his life to Scott, and while the relationship was often fraught with difficulty, it shaped him in significant ways. After Scott’s death, Norman is left to grapple with the void left by his absence and to redefine his own identity. While the film ends with Norman seemingly adrift, it also suggests the possibility of a new beginning, a chance for him to finally live life on his own terms, carrying the lessons learned from his time with Davenport Scott. He is forever changed, but potentially liberated.