Season 5 Episode 39 of “Have and Have Nots” delivers a pivotal shift in power dynamics, primarily answering the question: Does Hanna finally find concrete evidence of Jim Cryer’s criminal activities, and how does this evidence impact her plan to protect Benny? The episode confirms Hanna’s suspicions, revealing crucial proof of Jim’s deeply entrenched corruption and setting in motion a chain of events that irrevocably alter the fates of nearly every character.
The Weight of Evidence: Hanna’s Triumph and Tremors
Hanna’s relentless pursuit of justice finally bears fruit. Episode 39 focuses heavily on her painstaking work piecing together financial records and witness testimonies. She uncovers undeniable proof of Jim Cryer’s involvement in money laundering, fraudulent land deals, and his complicity in covering up multiple violent crimes.
This revelation doesn’t come without cost. While Hanna now possesses the ammunition to potentially dismantle the Cryer empire, she also understands the immense danger this puts her, and especially Benny, in. Jim Cryer is not a man to be trifled with, and the evidence against him directly threatens his freedom and, more importantly, his power.
The episode expertly balances Hanna’s triumph with the stark reality of the situation. The elation of finding the truth is quickly overshadowed by the daunting task of using it effectively and, crucially, staying alive. This sets the stage for the final, climactic episodes of the season, where the battle between the haves and have nots reaches its peak.
The Cryer Family on the Brink
The consequences of Jim’s actions ripple throughout his family. Katheryn, already grappling with her husband’s infidelity and her own moral compromises, finds herself further isolated and questioning her loyalty to him. Veronica, sensing the impending danger, begins maneuvering to protect her own interests, potentially at the expense of her brother and father.
The episode also highlights the internal conflicts within the Cryer family. Veronica’s calculating nature contrasts sharply with Katheryn’s increasing disillusionment. This divide serves to weaken the Cryer’s united front, making them more vulnerable to external threats, like Hanna.
David Harrington’s involvement also deepens the drama. His continued manipulation of the situation, coupled with his unpredictable nature, adds another layer of complexity to the already volatile mix.
Candace’s End Game: Power and Peril
Candace Young remains a force to be reckoned with. While her immediate focus is on securing her financial future and extracting herself from the dangers of her past, her actions indirectly contribute to the escalating conflict between Hanna and Jim.
Her shrewd business acumen and willingness to take risks continue to be her defining traits. However, the episode underscores the inherent peril in her choices. Her alliances are fragile, and her enemies are powerful. Her quest for power and security could very well lead to her downfall.
Frequently Asked Questions About Have and Have Nots Season 5 Episode 39
Here are some frequently asked questions to help you understand the nuances of Season 5 Episode 39:
H3 What specific evidence does Hanna uncover against Jim Cryer?
Hanna discovers meticulously concealed financial records linking Jim Cryer to offshore accounts used for money laundering. She also finds documented evidence of his involvement in fraudulent land deals that displaced numerous families, and she secures sworn statements from individuals who were paid to remain silent about crimes Jim covered up. The evidence encompasses a broad range of Jim’s illicit activities, painting a clear picture of his criminal enterprise.
H3 How does Candace’s relationship with Wyatt factor into the episode’s events?
Candace uses her connection to Wyatt to gather information and manipulate situations to her advantage. While Wyatt believes he is helping her, Candace is primarily using him for her own gain. This relationship, built on lies and manipulation, highlights Candace’s ruthless pursuit of her objectives. Her actions create unforeseen consequences that ripple through the other characters’ lives.
H3 What are Katheryn’s reactions to learning about Jim’s crimes?
Katheryn is initially shocked and heartbroken by the extent of Jim’s criminal activities. She struggles to reconcile her love for her husband with the reality of his actions. This episode marks a turning point for Katheryn, as she begins to seriously question her loyalty to Jim and consider the possibility of separating herself from him. Her moral compass is increasingly at odds with Jim’s behavior.
H3 How does David Harrington manipulate the situation in this episode?
David Harrington continues to play all sides, manipulating events to his advantage. He offers veiled threats to both the Cryer family and Hanna, playing on their vulnerabilities and fears. His actions are driven by a desire for power and control, and he seems to revel in the chaos he creates. He is a master puppeteer, pulling the strings behind the scenes.
H3 What is Benny’s role in Hanna’s plan?
Benny is Hanna’s primary motivation for seeking justice against Jim Cryer. She is determined to protect him from the consequences of Jim’s actions and ensure his safety. While Benny is not directly involved in the investigation, his well-being is Hanna’s driving force, influencing every decision she makes. Hanna views him as someone that needs protecting.
H3 How does Veronica react to the growing threat to the Cryer family?
Veronica, ever the pragmatist, begins to assess the situation and strategize how to protect herself and her assets. She is less concerned with the moral implications of Jim’s actions and more focused on the potential financial and social ramifications. She starts planting seeds of doubt and suspicion among the family members, preparing to distance herself from Jim if necessary. She is calculating and self-serving.
H3 Does Jeffrey have a significant role in this episode?
Jeffrey’s role is relatively minor in this episode, primarily revolving around his personal struggles and relationships. However, his presence serves as a reminder of the broader societal issues explored in the series, such as homophobia and discrimination. His storylines often serve as subplots that enrich the overall narrative.
H3 What is the significance of the episode’s ending?
The episode ends on a cliffhanger, leaving the audience in suspense about Hanna’s next move. The episode’s final moments suggest that Hanna is prepared to take drastic action, potentially putting herself in grave danger. This ending sets the stage for the remaining episodes of the season, promising a climactic confrontation between Hanna and Jim.
H3 How does the episode portray the theme of justice versus revenge?
The episode explores the complex relationship between justice and revenge. While Hanna seeks to bring Jim Cryer to justice for his crimes, her motivations are also fueled by a desire for revenge for the harm he has caused to her family. This ambiguity highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by the characters and the blurred lines between right and wrong.
H3 What are the long-term consequences of Jim Cryer’s actions, as revealed in this episode?
The episode reveals the devastating long-term consequences of Jim Cryer’s actions, not only for his victims but also for his own family. His criminal activities have created a legacy of pain, betrayal, and distrust, leaving a lasting impact on everyone involved. The episode underscores the destructive nature of unchecked power and greed.
H3 Where does the show typically film episodes of Have and Have Nots season 5?
The show is filmed primarily in Atlanta, Georgia, utilizing Tyler Perry Studios as its main production hub.
H3 What network originally broadcast Have and Have Nots?
The show was originally broadcast on the OWN network (Oprah Winfrey Network).