Classical and revisionist films represent two distinct approaches to filmmaking, often defined by their relationship to established genre conventions and societal norms. Classical films uphold and reinforce established tropes and values, while revisionist films challenge and subvert these conventions, often reflecting changing social, political, and cultural landscapes.
Defining Classical and Revisionist Film
The distinction between classical and revisionist cinema isn’t always absolute, but rather exists on a spectrum. A film might contain elements of both. Generally, however, classical films adhere to a specific set of rules, narratives, and character archetypes that are easily recognizable within their respective genres. They tend to reaffirm dominant ideologies and offer straightforward narratives with clear moral boundaries.
Revisionist films, on the other hand, deliberately question or reject these established formulas. They might offer a darker, more complex portrayal of characters, challenge traditional moral codes, or explore the social and political context in which the genre emerged in a critical light. They frequently grapple with the ambiguities and hypocrisies that classical films often overlook or ignore. This can involve re-examining historical events, questioning established heroes, or subverting happy endings.
Examples of Classical Films
Several films exemplify the classical approach:
-
The Western: Stagecoach (1939, dir. John Ford): Stagecoach perfectly embodies the classical Western. It features clearly defined heroes and villains, a straightforward narrative of good versus evil, and a romanticized depiction of the American frontier. The film celebrates courage, self-reliance, and the conquest of the wilderness, reinforcing the myth of the American West.
-
The Gangster Film: Little Caesar (1931, dir. Mervyn LeRoy): Little Caesar is a prototypical gangster film that follows the rise and fall of Rico Bandello. While it acknowledges the violence and brutality associated with organized crime, it ultimately reinforces societal values by portraying Rico’s ambition and ruthlessness as leading to his downfall, serving as a cautionary tale.
-
The Musical: Singin’ in the Rain (1952, dir. Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly): This iconic musical celebrates the transition from silent films to talkies with a lighthearted and optimistic tone. It’s a joyous and escapist experience, devoid of significant social commentary, and focused on the entertainment value of song and dance.
Examples of Revisionist Films
Revisionist films actively challenge the tropes established by their classical predecessors:
-
The Western: Unforgiven (1992, dir. Clint Eastwood): Unforgiven deconstructs the mythology of the Western by portraying violence as brutal and morally ambiguous. William Munny, the aging gunslinger, is not a hero but a deeply flawed man haunted by his violent past. The film questions the romanticized image of the gunslinger and offers a far more cynical view of the West.
-
The Gangster Film: The Godfather (1972, dir. Francis Ford Coppola): While The Godfather is often considered a classical gangster film, its complex portrayal of the Corleone family challenges the clear-cut moral boundaries of earlier films in the genre. The film explores the moral compromises and corruption inherent in organized crime, presenting the gangsters as complex, sympathetic figures, albeit deeply flawed ones.
-
The Musical: Cabaret (1972, dir. Bob Fosse): Cabaret uses the musical format to explore the rise of Nazism in 1930s Berlin. Unlike traditional musicals, it confronts dark themes of political extremism, social decay, and moral ambiguity. The dazzling musical numbers are juxtaposed with the growing threat of fascism, creating a stark and unsettling contrast.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
H3 What are some key characteristics of classical Hollywood cinema?
Classical Hollywood cinema is characterized by narrative clarity, seamless editing, and a focus on entertainment. It often features clear heroes and villains, straightforward plots, and happy endings. Production values are typically high, with a strong emphasis on visual spectacle and star power. The “invisible style” of filmmaking aims to immerse the audience in the story without drawing attention to the technical aspects of the production.
H3 How does a revisionist film typically treat its characters?
Revisionist films often present characters who are more complex and morally ambiguous than their classical counterparts. They might be anti-heroes or flawed individuals grappling with difficult choices. The film may delve into their psychological motivations and explore the social or historical forces that shape their behavior. Character development often takes precedence over simple plot mechanics.
H3 Is every film released after a classical period automatically revisionist?
No. A film’s release date doesn’t automatically qualify it as revisionist. Revisionism is defined by its conscious departure from and challenge to established genre conventions and ideological norms. A film released recently can still adhere to classical principles.
H3 How does revisionism affect genre conventions?
Revisionist films re-interpret and subvert genre conventions. They may play with narrative structure, character archetypes, and thematic elements to create a new and unconventional take on a familiar genre. This can involve questioning the assumptions and ideologies that underpin the genre.
H3 Can a film be both classical and revisionist?
Yes, a film can exhibit elements of both classical and revisionist cinema. It may adhere to some traditional conventions while simultaneously challenging others. The balance between these elements will determine the film’s overall classification. For example, a film might use classical narrative structure but feature morally ambiguous characters.
H3 What role does social context play in the development of revisionist films?
Social context is crucial. Revisionist films often emerge during periods of social and political upheaval, when established norms and values are being questioned. They reflect changing attitudes and offer critiques of dominant ideologies. The Vietnam War, the Civil Rights Movement, and the rise of feminism all contributed to the development of revisionist cinema in the 1960s and 1970s.
H3 Why are Westerns often cited as examples of both classical and revisionist cinema?
The Western genre has undergone significant transformations. Early Westerns like Stagecoach romanticized the frontier and celebrated American expansionism. Later, revisionist Westerns like Unforgiven challenged these myths, offering more critical and nuanced portrayals of the Old West. The genre’s evolution makes it a prime example for understanding the difference between classical and revisionist approaches. The Vietnam war and the Civil Rights Movement profoundly influenced the shift in perspective.
H3 What are some visual techniques commonly used in revisionist films to challenge classical norms?
Revisionist films often employ visual techniques that deconstruct the seamless style of classical Hollywood cinema. They might use jarring editing, unconventional camera angles, or gritty cinematography to create a more realistic and unsettling viewing experience. These techniques can challenge the audience’s expectations and draw attention to the film’s constructed nature.
H3 How does audience reception affect the perception of a film as classical or revisionist?
Audience reception plays a significant role. A film initially considered revisionist might become a classical example over time as its themes and techniques become more widely accepted. Conversely, a film once seen as classical may be re-evaluated in light of changing social and political attitudes, leading to a revised understanding of its message. A film’s impact and legacy are always subject to interpretation and reinterpretation.
H3 What is the difference between a parody and a revisionist film?
While both parody and revisionist films engage with existing genres, they do so with different intentions. Parody aims to humorously imitate and exaggerate the conventions of a genre, often for comedic effect. Revisionism, on the other hand, seeks to critically re-examine and subvert the genre’s underlying assumptions and ideologies. Parody focuses on entertainment through imitation; revisionism aims for a deeper level of analysis and critique.
H3 Are all revisionist films considered “better” than classical films?
No. The distinction between classical and revisionist is not about quality but rather about approach. Both classical and revisionist films can be well-made and artistically significant. Whether a film is “better” depends on individual taste and critical evaluation. Some viewers prefer the straightforward narratives and comforting familiarity of classical films, while others appreciate the complexity and challenging perspectives of revisionist films.
H3 How can I identify whether a film is classical or revisionist on my own?
Look for the film’s relationship to its genre and the dominant ideologies of its time. Ask yourself: Does the film uphold or challenge established conventions? Does it reinforce or question existing social and political norms? Does it present a clear moral code, or does it embrace ambiguity and complexity? Examining these aspects will help you determine whether a film leans towards a classical or revisionist approach. Paying attention to the historical context of the film’s creation and its impact upon release also offers valuable insights.