The original Fullmetal Alchemist anime, released in 2003, diverges significantly from the manga storyline beginning around episode 25. While earlier episodes introduce original elements, episode 25, “Inside the Armor,” marks a definitive shift away from Hiromu Arakawa’s source material, setting the anime on its own unique trajectory towards a dramatically different ending.
Early Anime vs. Manga: Seeds of Divergence
Before we pinpoint the precise episode where the divergence hardens, it’s crucial to understand that the 2003 Fullmetal Alchemist anime had already begun incorporating original content well before episode 25. This wasn’t necessarily a drastic departure from the spirit of the manga at first; rather, it was a filling-in of gaps, an elaboration of existing storylines, or an acceleration of certain plot points. However, these early alterations created the foundation upon which the later, more significant divergence would be built.
Think of it as planting seeds. The anime writers were subtly seeding new plot threads, new character motivations, and new mysteries that ultimately bloomed into a completely different narrative garden than the one Arakawa envisioned. This includes the introduction of new characters and subplots that have no equivalent in the manga.
The Crucial Episode: “Inside the Armor” (Episode 25)
While debated among fans, most agree that episode 25, “Inside the Armor,” represents the pivotal point where the anime begins a clear and irreversible departure from the manga. This episode delves into Alphonse Elric’s past in a way that isn’t entirely congruent with the manga’s depiction. While both versions explore Al’s history, the anime introduces specific elements and alters the timeline in a manner that sets up the later anime-exclusive storyline.
This is where the anime’s original antagonist, Dante, truly begins to take center stage in a way that overshadows the homunculi’s role in the manga at that point. The episode solidifies Dante’s plans, which involve capturing Al, and the motivation behind these plans, which starkly differ from the manga’s central conflict concerning Father and his ambitions.
The Aftermath: A Cascade of Changes
Following episode 25, the differences between the anime and manga become increasingly pronounced. The anime’s storyline surrounding the Philosopher’s Stone, the Homunculi’s origins and motivations, and the truth about the gate of alchemy diverge dramatically. Key events and character arcs are altered or replaced entirely.
The ending of the 2003 anime is completely original, offering a resolution that is tonally and thematically distinct from the manga’s conclusion in Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood. This divergence allowed the anime to explore themes of loss, sacrifice, and the nature of reality in its own unique way, even if it meant creating a narrative that was ultimately incompatible with Arakawa’s vision.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What was the primary reason for the divergence?
The primary reason for the divergence was the anime’s production timeline. The 2003 Fullmetal Alchemist anime was released while the manga was still ongoing. To create a conclusive ending, the anime writers had to forge their own path, as the manga’s ending was yet to be written.
Does Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood follow the manga more closely?
Yes, Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood is a more faithful adaptation of the manga. It largely follows the manga’s storyline and reaches a conclusion that aligns with Arakawa’s original intent. It’s considered the definitive adaptation by many fans.
Are there any benefits to watching both versions?
Absolutely! Watching both versions offers a unique viewing experience. The original anime provides an alternate take on the characters and world, exploring different themes and offering a different emotional resonance. It allows you to appreciate two distinct interpretations of the same source material.
What are some key differences in the Homunculi’s origins between the two versions?
In the 2003 anime, the Homunculi are created from failed human transmutations, making them deeply personal manifestations of the alchemists’ regrets. In Brotherhood, they are artificial beings created by Father as part of his plan to achieve godhood. This fundamental difference shapes their motivations and relationships.
How does the ending of the 2003 anime differ from Brotherhood‘s ending?
The 2003 anime ends with Edward sacrificing himself to bring Alphonse back, and then being transported to an alternate, parallel version of Earth. Alphonse remains in their original world. Brotherhood, on the other hand, features a more straightforward resolution where Edward defeats Father and restores Al’s body, allowing them both to continue their lives in their own world.
Which version, the 2003 anime or Brotherhood, is considered canon?
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood is generally considered the canon adaptation of the manga. Arakawa herself was involved in its production, ensuring it stayed true to her vision. The 2003 anime is considered an alternate universe or a divergent adaptation.
How does Dante’s role differ between the anime and the manga?
Dante is a major antagonist in the 2003 anime, orchestrating many of the events and manipulating the Homunculi. She doesn’t exist in the manga. Her motivations revolve around transferring her soul to younger bodies to achieve immortality, which is a completely anime-exclusive plot point.
Does the 2003 anime explain the nature of alchemy in the same way as the manga/Brotherhood?
Not entirely. While the fundamental principles of equivalent exchange remain the same, the 2003 anime subtly alters the nature of the gate and the source of alchemic power. In Brotherhood, the source is the planet’s life force. The 2003 anime implies something different, but it is less defined.
Are there any manga-exclusive characters or plot points missing from the 2003 anime even before episode 25?
Yes, even before episode 25, certain manga-exclusive characters and subplots are omitted or altered in the 2003 anime. This is mainly due to pacing and the anime team making choices about which elements to prioritize and which to cut. These smaller changes add up, contributing to the eventual divergence.
What impact did the anime’s early divergence have on the overall story?
The anime’s early divergence significantly impacted the overall story by creating a foundation for a completely different narrative. The alterations to character motivations, the introduction of anime-exclusive elements, and the shifting focus of the conflict all contributed to the anime’s unique trajectory.
Is it possible to watch the 2003 anime and switch to Brotherhood to see the manga ending?
While technically possible, it’s not recommended. The two versions diverge so significantly that transitioning midway can be confusing and jarring. It’s best to view them as separate entities and experience each one from beginning to end.
Which version should a new viewer watch first?
That’s a matter of personal preference! Many recommend starting with Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood because it provides the most faithful adaptation of the manga and its complete story. However, others suggest watching the 2003 anime first to experience a unique and darker interpretation before diving into the manga-accurate Brotherhood. Ultimately, it depends on what a viewer is looking for in their Fullmetal Alchemist experience.